![]() |
Historical Tax Rates |
Once in power, Ronald Reagan pursued four policies that enhanced the power of the accumulating class overall and his personal constituency in particular. Practically his first act as president was the decertification of the striking air traffic controllers union, PATCO. This was a signal to corporate America that the social contract established between big labor and the Eastern establishment would no longer be enforced. Second, he ramped up the Cold War by falsely claiming that the Soviet Union was expanding its military when in actuality it was experiencing its own fiscal crisis. This was an excuse to funnel more federal dollars to the military contractors who backed his candidacy. Third, Paul Volcker pulled the plug on the economy by dramatically raising interest rates to 21%! This was an absolute boon to big capital, that could shut down marginally profitable industries that had unionized workers and move productive enterprises to the antiunion South, or better yet, to countries that had little or no labor protection whatsoever and who paid their workers a fraction of what American workers cost. Fourth, the Reagan Administration passed the Kemp Roth tax cuts, which benefited high income earners over low and generated a shift of wealth up the system. Not only did it decrease marginal rates by 23%, it cut corporate taxes by $150 billion, and reduced estate taxes. In 1986, the top tax rate was reduced again from 50% to 28% and the bottom tax rates were raised from 11% to 15%. This is an incredible transfer of wealth up the system. The current top tax rate is 35%, exactly half of what it was in 1980.
Simultaneously, the Reagan Administration was tearing away the social safety net and removing support for poor people. All people on Social Security disability were thrown off the rolls and had to reapply, confirming their disability. Federal-aid to welfare was cut, the war on drugs was ramped up, and federal support public housing was ended.
So, how could this newly emerging elite that it taken over the state so successfully implement its program of enriching the rich to the detriment of the rest of society? We have all heard of the term "Reagan Democrats" which refers to an older white working-class predominantly male constituency that shared Ronald Reagan's antipathy toward privileged youth in the counterculture and black Americans. Richard Nixon, in an earlier phase, referred to them as the "silent majority." By using cultural appeals to this constituency, the Republican Party found that it could gain conservative white males on wedge issues of drugs, women's rights, abortion, and "family values." As Thomas Frank pointed out in his enlightening book, What's the Matter with Kansas?, that cultural appeals could actually get white working-class males to vote for candidates who would work against the material interests of the working class.
The tax cuts can be viewed as a sacking of the public treasury by the rich. The tax cuts plus the increase in the military budget in peace time and the war on drugs created a deficit that lasted through the Bush I Administration. Tax breaks for the rich, welfare for corporations in the form of military expenditures, and shoving it to the poor created greater inequality. During the 1970s, the Gini coefficient, and index of economic inequality averaged around 36. In the 1980s, it jumped to around 40. Wages stagnated and the rich got richer. Hmm, sounds like a strategy. And Reagan is one of the most popular of recent presidents!
No comments:
Post a Comment